COGS / TCO / Should-cost assessment
When evaluating the cost and feasibility of a product or project, relying solely on the Bill of Materials (BOM) provides only a partial view of the overall cost structure. While the BOM outlines direct component costs, it does not capture the full range of factors that influence the total development and industrialisation cost required to bring a product to production readiness.
To enable accurate budgeting in later stages of development, as well as effective strategic planning and informed decision-making, a holistic approach to cost assessment is essential. During the early development phase, cost estimates are typically indicative and based on limited data. However, as the concept matures, a more precise and comprehensive cost model becomes critical to validate feasibility and align cross-functional expectations.
This refined analysis involves evaluating the broader cost structure behind a manufactured product. In addition to assessing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), it incorporates a pre-validated should-cost analysis (SCA) - an upfront assessment used to define a realistic and justifiable manufacturing cost before procurement evaluates supplier pricing. Together, these frameworks help uncover hidden cost drivers and identify opportunities for efficiency and value optimisation across the supply chain.
By integrating these methodologies and enhancing them with AI-driven tools, we can identify and manage a broader range of cost drivers, including but not limited to:
Direct material costs (BOM):
- Raw materials (e.g., PCBs, semiconductors, batteries)
- PCB fabrication and assembly
- Enclosure manufacturing (e.g., injection molding, CNC machining)
- Wiring, connectors, and cable harnesses
- Standard product packaging materials
- Fasteners, adhesives, coatings and consumables
Direct labor costs:
- Manual assembly labour
- Supervision in automated production lines
- Wages, benefits and payroll-related costs for production personnel
Manufacturing overhead (apportioned to production):
- Factory utilities (electricity, water, etc.)
- Depreciation of manufacturing equipment
- Factory rent or lease costs
- Maintenance and repair of production equipment
- Factory consumables (e.g. lubricants, cleaning materials)
Production-specific costs:
- Tooling and setup costs (amortised across production volumes)
- Testing and quality control (unit-level or batch-level testing)
- Subcontracted or outsourced manufacturing services
Inbound logistics:
- Freight-in (transport of materials and components to the production facility)
- Customs duties and import fees
Other direct production costs:
- Product-specific packaging assembly (e.g., custom-fit foam, internal trays)
- Scrap and production waste (where structurally expected and accounted for)
By integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) across the entire product lifecycle (from initial concept to detailed, data-driven cost models) we can eliminate unforeseen cost overruns and reduce financial risk. AI-driven simulations and predictive analytics provide real-time insights into material choices, manufacturing processes, supply chain dynamics, and operational constraints, enabling accurate cost breakdowns early in development.
Within our Ultimate Development Roadmap, AI is embedded at key milestones: ideation, design, validation, sourcing and production, creating a cohesive, data-informed framework that aligns with product goals, team workflows and business objectives.
This integration enhances COGS, TCO, and pre-screened Should-Cost Analysis, making them not only more precise but also adaptable to design changes, market shifts and supplier performance variations. The result is a technology-driven approach that transforms cost modelling into a strategic tool; supporting faster decisions, optimized resources and strong cross-functional alignment.